• Effect Of Corporate Social Responsibility On Profitability Of Listed Deposit Money Banks In Nigeria

  • CHAPTER TWO -- [Total Page(s) 8]

    Page 3 of 8

    Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7    Next
    • There are several arguments in favour of corporate social responsibility. One view held by critics of the corporate world, is that since large firms create many social problems, they should attempt to address and solve them (Robbins & Colter, 2007). They went further to suggest that firms can do a better job of producing quality, safe products, and in conducting their operations in an open and honest manner. Robbins and Colter (2007) also says that the "self- interest" argument that suggests firms should conduct themselves in such a way in the present as to assure themselves of a favorable operating environment in the future. In this theory of the firm-based model, managers conduct a cost/benefit analysis to determine the level of resources to devote to CSR activities/attributes. Simply put, firms simultaneously assess the demand for CSR and the cost of satisfying this demand and then determine the optimal level of CSR to provide. Robbins and Colter (2007) explain that some suggestions that businesses should assume social responsibilities because they are among the few private entities that have the resources to do so. The corporate world has some of the brightest minds in the world, and it possesses tremendous financial resources.
      2.2.2    Net Profit Margin
      The net profit margin ratio is a profitability ratio. Essentially, it is the percentage of profit from business operations after deducting business operating expenses. Net profit margin is the percentage of revenue left after all expenses have been deducted from sales (turnover). The measurement reveals the amount of profit that a business can extract from its total revenue. Net profit margin is the ratio of net profits to revenues for a company or business segment. Typically expressed as a percentage, net profit margins show how much of each naira collected by a company as revenue translates into profit. The equation to calculate net profit margin is: net margin = net profit / revenue. Net profit margin indicates how well the company converts its sales into profits. It is both a measure of efficiency and of overall business health.
      Companies that generate greater profit per naira of sales are more efficient. Companies with high net profit margin ratios are also better able to survive a product line that does not meet expectations or a period of economic contraction. Net Profit Margin Ratio is also a good time- series analysis measure, whereby business owners can look at company data across different time periods to see how the business is trending. A comparative analysis points to profit areas that have deteriorated or of increased cost trends that are reducing net profit. Financial ratios like the net profit margin ratio become most meaningful when they are viewed over time. The usefulness of the ratio, like all business data, has some limitations. Since industries are so different, the net profit margin is not very good at comparing companies in different industries. It is better at comparing similar businesses, not only ones in the same industry, but ones of similar size, or with similar product lines or doing business in the same broad geographic area.
      2.2.3    Return on Total Assets
      The return on total assets ratio, often called the return on total assets, is a profitability ratio that measures the net income produced by total assets during a period by comparing net income to the average total assets. In other words, the return on total assets ratio or ROTA measures how efficiently a company can manage its assets to produce profits during a period.
      Since company assets' sole purpose is to generate revenues and produce profits, this ratio helps both management and investors see how well the company can convert its investments in total assets into profits. ROTA is seen as a return on investment for the company since capital assets are often the biggest investment for most companies. In this case, the company invests money into capital assets and the return is measured in profits. Return on Total Assets (ROTA) is an indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. ROTA gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings.
      It is calculated by dividing a company's annual earnings by its total assets, ROTA is displayed as a percentage. The return on total assets (ROTA) ratio illustrates how well management is employing the company's total assets to make a profit. The higher the return, the more efficient management is in utilizing its asset base. The ROTA ratio is calculated by comparing net income to average total assets, and is expressed as a percentage. This ratio can also be represented as a product of the profit margin and the total asset turnover. Either formula can be used to calculate the return on total assets. When using the first formula, average total assets are usually used because asset totals can vary throughout the year. Simply add the beginning and ending assets together on the statement of financial position and divide by two to calculate the average assets for the year. The return on total assets ratio measures how effectively a company can earn a return on its investment in assets. In other words, ROTA shows how efficiently a company can convert the money used to purchase assets into net income or profits.
      Since all assets are either funded by equity or debt, some investors try to disregard the costs of acquiring the assets in the return calculation by adding back interest expense in the formula. It only makes sense that a higher ratio is more favourable to investors because it shows that the company is more effectively managing its assets to produce greater amounts of net income. A positive ROTA ratio usually indicates an upward profit trend as well. ROTA is most useful for comparing companies in the same industry as different industries use assets differently.
      2.2.4    Return on Equity
      Return on equity (ROE) is a measure of profitability that calculates how many naira of profit a company generates with each naira of shareholders' equity. The formula for ROE is Net Income/Shareholders' Equity. ROE is sometimes called return on net worth. The return on equity ratio or ROE is a profitability ratio that measures the ability of a firm to generate profits from its shareholders investments in the company. In other words, the return on equity ratio shows how much profit each naira of common stockholders' equity generates. ROE is more than a measure of profit; it is a measure of efficiency. A rising ROE suggests that a company is increasing its ability to generate profit without needing as much capital. It also indicates how well a company's management is deploying the shareholders' capital.
      In other words, the higher the ROE the better; falling ROE is usually a problem. However, it is important to note that if the value of the shareholders' equity goes down, ROE goes up. Thus, write-downs and share buybacks can artificially boost ROE. Likewise, a high level of debt can artificially boost ROE; after all, the more debt a company has, the less shareholders' equity it has (as a percentage of total assets), and the higher its ROE is. Banking industry tends to have higher returns on equity than others. As a result, comparisons of returns on equity are generally most meaningful among companies within the same industry, and the definition of a high or low ratio should be made within this context.
  • CHAPTER TWO -- [Total Page(s) 8]

    Page 3 of 8

    Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7    Next
    • ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]ABSTRACTAlthough an enormous body of literature has emerged concerning the nexus between corporate social responsibility and profitability, actual empirical research designed to test the multitude of definitions, propositions, concepts and theories that have been advanced has produced mix results. In addition, much of the research done in the area has been incomplete and simplistic in methodology and epistemology. Many of the methodological quagmires in studying the nexus between corporate socia ... Continue reading---

         

      APPENDIX A - [ Total Page(s): 2 ]APPENDIX A STUDY DATA SET ... Continue reading---

         

      APPENDIX B - [ Total Page(s): 4 ]APPENDIX B4 REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF TABLES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF TABLESPageTable 1 List of quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria     Table 2 Descriptive Statistics     Table 3 Variance Inflator Factor     Table 4 New Variance Inflator Factor     Table 5 Durbin-Watson Statistics     Table 6 Heteroskedasticity Test for NPM Model    Table 7 Stationarity Test    Table 8 Hausman Specification Test    Table 9 Shapiro-Wilk W Test for normal data    Table 10 Granger causality test    Table 11 Linear Regression of NPM Random ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF FIGURES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF FIGURESPageFigure 1 Link between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability    ... Continue reading---

         

      TABLE OF CONTENTS - [ Total Page(s): 1 ] TABLE OF CONTENTS    Title page        PageDeclaration       Certification        Approval page        Dedication         Acknowledgements         Table of Contents         List of Tables        List of Figures       List of Appendices        Abstract         CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION1.1    Background to the Study   1.2    Statement of the Problem   1.3    Statement of Research Questions    1.4    Objecti ... Continue reading---

         

      List of Appendixes - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF APPENDICESPageAppendix A: Study Data Set  Appendix B1: Descriptive Statistics     Appendix B2: Diagnostic Tests Results     Appendix B3: ANOVA Results     Appendix B4: Regression Coefficients    ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER ONE - [ Total Page(s): 5 ]Profitability is the final measure of economic success achieved by a firm in relation to the capital invested in it. This economic success is determined by the magnitude of the net profit (Pimentel, Braga & Casa Nova, 2015). To achieve an appropriate return over the amount of risk accepted by the shareholders, is the main objective of firms operating in capitalist economies. After all, profit is the propulsive element of any investments in different projects. The assessment of profitability is u ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER THREE - [ Total Page(s): 2 ]CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY3.1    IntroductionThis chapter addresses methodological issues which include research design, population and sample size; sources and methods of data collection; techniques of data analysis and definition and measurement of variables. It also consists of diagnostics and post estimation tests. This study adopts a longitudinal panel research design and uses panel data (cross sectional and time series data) to analyze the effects of CSR on the profitability of listed de ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FOUR - [ Total Page(s): 9 ]4.4.3    Effect of CSR on ROEThe effect of corporate social responsibility on profitability measured by return on equity (ROE) is shown Table 13 as follows:R2 = 0.908    Adjusted R2 = 0.906F-Statistics = 445.340    Prob > F = 0.000 Source: IBM SPSS 22 Outputs based on study dataAs shown in Table 13, results on the effect of CSR on ROE show that the coefficient of CSR was 0.009 hence CSR had a positive effect on ROE. It also suggests that for every unit increase in CSR, profitability inc ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FIVE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]CHAPTER FIVESUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS5.1    SummaryThe overall objective was to study the effect of corporate social responsibility on profitability of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. The findings indeed supported the overall relationship with an explanation of 72.25 per cent with regard to NPM and 95 per cent with regard to ROTA and 91% with regard to ROE. NPM, ROTA and ROE models were found to be significant at 5% level of significance too. The study employed both causa ... Continue reading---

         

      REFRENCES - [ Total Page(s): 2 ]REFERENCESAbbasi, A., & Malik, Q. A. (2015). Firms‘ size moderating financial performance in growing firms: An empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 334-339.Abdul-Hamid, F. Z. (2004). Corporate social disclosures of banks and finance companies: Malaysian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(4), 118- 129.Abdulrahman, S. (2013). The influence of corporate social responsibility on profit after tax of some selected deposit mone ... Continue reading---