Strategic Planning And The Achievement Of Organizational Goals

CHAPTER FOUR
Presentations and Analysis of Data 
This chapter focuses on the presentation and analysis of research data collected for this study through the questionnaires administered observations and interviews conducted.
The views of sixty-seven (67) respondents to the questionnaires were used instead of the total number of eighty that was distributed. Also the research hypothesis was tested through the use of chi-square formular.
TABLE I
When was your organization established?

Table 1 show that 46 respondents representing 68.7% of the total respondents said that their organization was established before 1995 showing that they have been into existence for upto 15years. 5 respondents representing 7.5% of the total respondents said that their organization come into existence between    1996 -1999,    7 respondents representing 10.4% of the total respondents said that their organization was established between    2000 -2003    and    9 respondents representing 13.4% of the total respondents said that their organization was established between 2002 -2005.

Table II shows that organization has a 20.9% dominance of male, 40.3% dominance for female and 38.8% equalit y of male and female in the composition of their staff.

Table III is showing us that 27 respondent representing 40.3% of
the total respondents said that the capital strength of their organization is very strong, 30 respondents representing 44.8% of the total respondent aid that the capital strength of their organization is strong and 10 respondents representing 14.9% of the total respondents are of the view that their organizations capital strength is weak which calls for help.

From the table above,    I    found that    11    respondents representing 16.4% of the total respondents were of the v iew that the organization gets its raw materials through importation, 16 representing 23.9% said that it is through local acquisition while 40 respondents representing 59.7% of the total respondents said that the organization’s raw -materials were gotten th rough importation and local acquisition.

Table V is telling us that 15 respondents representing 22.4% of the total respondents said that the organization gets upto 80% of their raw material through importation while 52 respondents representing 77.6% of the total respondents disagreed with the opinion that their organization gets up to 80% of their raw -material through importation.

Table VI is telling us that 43 respondents representing 64.2% of the total respondents said that they pay for their import before the goods are being imported while 24 respondents representing 35.8% of the total respondent are of the opinion that the organization pay for their imported goods after importation.

Table VII

Table VII shows that 10 respondents representing 14.9% of the total respondents said that the organization pay for their imports through cash , 22 respondents representing 32.8%    of the total respondents said that it is through cheque that the organization make payment for    their    imports, 17 respondents representing 25.4%    of the total respondents were of the view that the organization pay for their imports through cash and cheque and finally, 18 respondents representing 26. 9% of the total respondents said that they are not aware of how their organization pay for imported goods.