-
Comparing The Compressive Strength Of Concrete Made With Sand As Fine Aggregate And Made With Chipping Dust As Fine Aggregate
-
-
-
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title page
Approval page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of content
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
1.1 Background of the study
1.2 Scope of study
1.3 Statement of problem
1.4 Objective of the study
1.5 Significant of study
CHAPTER TWO
Literature review
2.1 Concrete definition and historical development
2.2 Concrete as a structural material
2.3 Characteristics of concrete
2.4 Types of concrete
2.5 Factors influence concrete properties
2.6 Cement content
2.7 Manufactured fine aggregates
2.8 Characteristics of manufacture fine aggregates
2.9 History of the origin of cement
CHAPTER THREE
Materials and methodology
3.1 Concrete
3.2 Cement
3.3 Fine aggregate
3.4 Quarry rock dust
3.5 Curing
3.6 Water
3.7 Water for curing and washing
3.8 Definition of workability
3.9 Measuring of workability
3.10 Slump test
3.11 Procedure for slump test
3.12 Comprehensive strength test
3.13 Specific gravity test
3.13.1 Specific gravity test
3.14 Procedure to determine water absorption aggregate
3.15 Concrete curing
3.15.1 Reason for curing concrete
CHAPTER FOUR
Presentation of data analysis
(LIST OF TABLES)
Table 4.1 Quarry dust (actual value)
Table 4.2 Quarry dust (control values)
Table 4.3 Rivers sand (actual value)
Table 4.4 Rivers sand (control value)
Table 4.5 Density of concrete quarry dust
Table 4.6 Quarry dust control
Table 4.7 River sand actual
Table 4.8 Rivers sand control
Table 4.9 Slump test result (River sand) actual value
Table 4.10 slump test value (River sand) control value
Table 4.11 Slump value (Quarry dust) actual value
Table 4.12 slum test value (Quarry dust)control value
Table 4.13 Density and specific gravity of the fine aggregates
Table 4.14 Specific gravity ad water absorption of coarse aggregate
Table 4.15 Sieve analysis result (River sand)
Table 4.16 Sieve analysis result (Quarry Dust)
CHAPTER FIVE
Recommendation and conclusion
5.1 Discussion
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendation
References
-
-
-
ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]Common river sand is expensive due to the excessive cost of transportation from natural sources. Also, large-scale depletion of these sources creates environmental problems. As environmental transportation and other constraints make the availability and use of river sand less attractive, a substitute or replacement product for concrete industry needs to be found. River sand is most commonly used fine aggregate in the production of concrete poses the problem of acute shortage in many areas. Whose ... Continue reading---
-
ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]Common river sand is expensive due to the excessive cost of transportation from natural sources. Also, large-scale depletion of these sources creates environmental problems. As environmental transportation and other constraints make the availability and use of river sand less attractive, a substitute or replacement product for concrete industry needs to be found. River sand is most commonly used fine aggregate in the production of concrete poses the problem of acute shortage in many areas. Whose ... Continue reading---
TABLE OF CONTENTS -- [Total Page(s) 1]
Page 1 of 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS -- [Total Page(s) 1]
Page 1 of 1