A study by Olwedo et al.,(2008) on the factors associated with malnutrition in internally displaced persons’ camps of Northern Uganda indicated that a male child was nearly two times more likely to suffer from acute malnutrition compared to a female child (Adjusted odds Ratio of 1.56 at 95% C.I 1.15-2.13 with p-value=0.004**). This situation could be due to the fact that boys are rare at home given the fact that they tend to be active running around in the neighbourhood as compared to female children who in most cases eat whatever small feeds that their mothers got since they are always with them at home. The above findings are contrary to the study findings in Araba and Kalmalo districts which found out that
2.3.2 AGE OF CHILD
Recent studies have found out that younger children are less likely to be malnourished than the older children. In the growth life cycle of children, weaning and less breast milk make them more vulnerable to under-five malnutrition. However, after weaning, the children begin to get adequate nutrition when they get used to complementary feeding (Shrimpton et al.,2001).
It is important to note that specific ages, children’s nutritional status is sensitive to feeding, weaning practices, care, and exposure to infection. A cumulative indicator of growth retardation (height-for-age) in children is positively associated with age. A study done in Ethiopia has also shown an increase in malnutrition with increase in age of the child (Yimer, 2000). The findings are similar in Araba andKalmalo districts where children aged 37-48 months were five times more likely to be underweight than their counterparts aged less than 12 months.
A study conducted by Nguyen and Kam in Vietnam found out that the risk of malnutrition increases with age of a child. Children in theyoungest age group 0-11 months had significantly lower risk of being stunted, underweight and wasted than children in the older age groups (Nguyen and Kam., 2008). The low risk to malnutrition may be due to the protective effect of breastfeeding since almost all children are breastfed throughout the first year of life. Higher rates of malnutrition after the 12 months are linkedto inappropriate food supplementation during the weaning period.
According to (UBOS and Macro International Inc, 2007), malnutrition increases with the age of the child through the first three years of life before declining in the fourth and fifth year. The increase is especially rapid during the first two years of life, as evidenced in the rise from 13 percent among children aged 6-8 months to 45 percent among children aged 18-23 months. It is expected that parents give less attention to older children when they give birth to a new child who needs much attention and care. Similar findings have been reported in different countries for instance in Kwara state of Nigeria (Babatunde, 2011), in Kenya (Kabubo-Mariara et al., 2006) and rural India (Sarmistha, 1999). The findings are plausible considering that many of the younger children are still being breastfed and chronic malnutrition sets in only after weaning ( Babatunde and Qaim, 2010).
2.3.3 BIRTH ORDER
Research findings indicate that malnutrition is rare among under-five children of birth order 2-3 and that higher birth order (5+) is positively associated with child malnutrition (Sommerfelt et al., 1994; Jeyaseelan, 1997). In a study carried out among 6939 children underfive years in Bangladesh, the prevalence of stunting increased with birth order hence most of the children who were of birth order more than two had greater chances of stunting and wasting (Rayhan and Hayat., 2006).
Worthy to note is that few studies according to the literature search have been conducted on the subject of child birth order and malnutrition among underfive children. During the study in Araba and kalmalo districts of Illela, it was found quite easy to get actual information concerning birth order because the respondents found it easy to recall after all,they could easily tell by looking at their children.
2.3.4 BIRTH INTERVAL
In another study conducted in Bangladesh, children within the first birth interval were 1.66 times more likely to be stunted and children whose preceding birth interval was less than two years were 1.32 times significantly more likely to be stunted as compared to children of a preceding birth interval 24 months or above. Similar results were observed for underweight children (Nure., Nuruzzaman and Goni, 2011). The study indicated that preceding birth intervals and child stunting were statistically significant (p<0.05). Preceding birth intervals of 18-35 months had a marginally positive significance on stunting whereas the interval of more than 48 months shows a negative relationship on stunting.