• Resonant Tunning Through Quantum Dot Array

  • CHAPTER THREE -- [Total Page(s) 9]

    Page 1 of 9

    1 2 3 4 5    Next
    • CHAPTER THREE
      INTRODUCTION
      In the past two decades, self-organized InAs/GaAs quantum dots (QDs) grown by Stranski- Krastanow (S-K) method have been intensively investigated1 , not only due to their unique properties of “artificial atoms”, but due to their possible device applications as well. Although InAs/GaAs QDs are often inserted into Schottky diodes to study their electronic structure2,3, electron resonant tunneling through the QDs in these Schottky diodes is very rarely focused on4-
      6. Usually, quantum-dot resonant tunneling signals in current-voltage (I-V) characteristics can only be obtained at extremely low temperature (typically ≤4.2K), either in Schottky resonant tunneling diodes4 (RTDs) or in double barrier RTDs with two-side Ohmic contacts7,8. The main reason is, however, the signals are obscured by thermal current. By virtue of electron beam lithography technique, resonant tunneling via an individual QD in Schottky RTD can be observed at ~130K5 . When very small mesas are fabricated (0.5μm square in Ref. 5), their peripheral regions are not active but depleted and that can to some extent increase the ratio of resonant tunneling current to hot current. Li and Wang’s6 experiments are executed at 77K, but they have not clarified why the detected resonant tunneling peaks do not originate from bound states of Al0.3Ga0.7As/GaAs superlattice structures in their devices. To the best of our knowledge, one can observe electron resonant tunneling through QD Schottky RTDs only in one voltage direction4-6. In the present work, we will exhibit resonant tunneling semaphores under both forward and reverse biased conditions at relatively
      high temperature of 77K through reducing the thermal current in In As/GaAs quantum-dot Schottky RTDs by inserting a thin AlAs barrier layer. Our theoretical calculations coincide with experimental results very well.
      THEORY
      The conduction band profile of our Schottky RTDs can be calculated analytically. Since there are intrinsic layers between metal and n-type semiconductors, the case is more complicated than standard Schottky junction illustrated in semiconductor physics textbooks. Fig. 2 shows the energy band diagram of the RTD in thermal equilibrium, where xd is the depletion layer width, and –V0, -Φ, Φn are electric potentials at x=-a, x=0 and x>xd, respectively (V0, Φ, Φn>0). The origin of the coordinates, x=0, is selected at the interface between 2nm undoped GaAs and n+ GaAs buffer layer. E0 is the differential value between the binding energy state in InAs QD and the conduction band edge of GaAs.
      APPLICATION OF HAMILTONIAN ON RESONANT TUNNELING QUANTUM DOT ARRAYS
      Considering the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional (1D) array of N coupled dots, indexed from left to right as 1−N
      The Hamiltonian equation above is a representation of Quantum dot array i.e 1- Darray of N coupled dots index from left to right as 1- N. looking at the energy of a quantum dot confined dots (20 energy states been treated as a single quantum system
      From the equation
      εka is the energy levels in leads
      εia is the ith dot of the energy
      Ui is the ith inter- dot repulsion and the inter-dot coupling between the ith dot and its right neighbor (the (i+1)th dot)
      V L and V R are the tunnels matrix element connecting thedot 1 (dot N) to the left and right lead.
  • CHAPTER THREE -- [Total Page(s) 9]

    Page 1 of 9

    1 2 3 4 5    Next
    • ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]Abstract coming soon ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER ONE - [ Total Page(s): 4 ]CHAPTER ONERESONANT TUNNELING THROUGH QUANTUM DOT ARRAYS1.1    IntroductionResonant tunneling through Quantum dot arrays is the quantum-mechanical effect of transition through a classically-forbidden energy state.Consider rolling a ball up a hill. If the ball is not given enough velocity, then it will not roll over the hill. This makes sense classically. But in quantum mechanics, objects exhibit wavelike behavior. For a quantum particle moving against a potential hill, the wave function descr ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER TWO - [ Total Page(s): 2 ]CHAPTER TWORESONANT TUNNELING THROUGH QUANTUM DOT ARRAY PROCESSE is incident on a potential barrier of height V0 . Classically the electron is reflected when E< V0, but quantum mechanically there is a certain probability that the electron is transmitted through the barrier.Tunneling is a purely quantum mechanical phenomena which enables electrons to penetrate potential barriers even though it is classically forbidden. The scheme is illustrated in Figure above. Classically the electron would be r ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FOUR - [ Total Page(s): 2 ]CHAPTER FOURDISCUSSION OF RESULTSFrom the matrices gotten in the previous chapter, it is seen that the diagonal four-by-four matrices are proportional to the partition function Z.In Eq. (2), En, is the energy of many-body state (n, i), the ith of the n-particle states, RL ,®ij are the transition rates between state (n,i) and (n-I,j) by losing or getting one electron through the left (right) lead, and peqn,I is the occupation probability of state (n,i) at equilibriumEquation (2) is basically t ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FIVE - [ Total Page(s): 3 ]CHAPTER FIVECONCLUSION ... Continue reading---

         

      REFRENCES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]REFERENCESFriedlander, Michael W. 2000 A Thin Cosmic Rain: Particles from Outer Space (Cambridge:Harvard University Press).Watson, Alan 2001 “Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: What we Know Now and What the FutureHolds,” in Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas Symposium (AIP Conference Procedings, volume 586, J. C. Wheeler and H. Martel (eds.) American Institure of Physics, pp. 817–826. (The original abstract was different from the published abstract)Anderson, Carl D ... Continue reading---