Discussion of the Findings
Statistics in Table 6 reveals that the calculated r-value was .414 while p-value 0.02 is lesser than the significance level 0.05 and for 133 degree of freedom. Therefore, the null hypothesis which stated that there is no significant relationship between human resources availability and teacher productivity was rejected. This indicates that, there is significant relationship between human resources availability and teacher productivity. This means that adequate and human resources availability enhances teacher productivity. The finding of this main hypothesis is in agreement with the findings of Emmer and Stough (2001) who asserted that the adequate and availability of human resources is critical to teacher productivity. Oyinloye (2001), also opined that adequate and availability of human resources promote the effective and efficient job delivery.
Table 7 shows that, the calculated r-value was .413 while p-value 0.02 is lesser than the significance level 0.05 and for 138 degree of freedom. Thus, the null hypothesis which stated that there is no significant relationship between material resources availability and teacher productivity was rejected. This means that, there is significant relationship between material resources availability and teacher productivity. This finding aligns with Alderman (2008) who contended that material resources availability and teacher productivity. He affirmed that inadequate of material resources in secondary school impaired the level of teachers’ productivity and performance in the school system.
Table 8 shows that, the calculated r-value was .417 while p-value 0.02 is lesser than the significance level 0.05 and for 133 degree of freedom. The null hypothesis which stated that there is no significant relationship between financial resources availability and teacher productivity was rejected. This shows that, there is significant relationship between financial resources availability and teacher productivity. This finding is in line with Okunamiri (2009) noted that educational finance critically examines all the costs and expenditure in the production of educational services which is both labour and capital intensive. However, suggested that if teachers’ job performance could be enhance maximally financial commitment into the school both from the government, proprietors and educational stakeholders.