Biological factors and juvenile delinquency
In one study, Alexander Schauss (1980) compared a sample of macerated
youth with a non-delinquent control group and found that the most
significant factor separating the youths was the extremely high milk
intake among the delinquents.
Iwarimie – Jaja (1999a:46) assets that:
On
the hypothetical correlation between anti-social behaviour and
bio-chemical make-up, it may be argued that people’s intake,
particularly chemical foods, drugs and drinks may alter or influence
behaviour, not, particularly criminal or delinquent, but aggressive and
violent, which, may not be intentionalâ€.
However, some
studies have criticize the predictive power of the link between juvenile
delinquency exist that some recent studies (e.g. Ferguson et.al, 1980)
have failed to substantiate this claim, especially in the association
between sugar consumption and violent behaviour. However, research
studies which associate violent behaviour with abnormal hormone level
seem to predict that there is a causal relationship between abnormal
levels of the male sex hormones androgens and aggressive behaviour.
Ellis (1989) has identified excess of androgens as one causal of brain
seizure which under stressful conditions, leads to emotional volatility.
Moreover, criminologists have investigated the effect of
allergies, especially cerebral allergies and neuroallergies on
anti-social behaviour. According to Siegel (1992:161).
Cerebral
allergies cause, an excessive reaction of the brain, where as
neuro-allergies affect the nervous system. Neuroallergies and cerebral
allergies are believed to cause the allergic person to produce enzymes
that attack wholesome foods as if they are dangerous to the body. They
may dangerous to the body. They may also cause swelling of the brain,
which can produce mental, emotional and behavioural problems including
hyper-emotionality, aggressiveness and violent behaviourâ€.
However, while this evidence seems persuasive, the relationship between
biochemical intake and abnormal behaviour is far from being both
methodologically unsound and also in practical because of the cost of
providing dietary supplement for actual and potential delinquent. In
addition, a number of controlled experiment have failed to substantiate
any real link between the two variables. Nutritionist Dian Vans reviewed
the available evidence and found reason to doubt a diet – delinquency
link.
Another important area of concern for biological
researchers is the genetic make-up of delinquents. It has been
hypothesized that some youths inherit a genetic configuration that
predisposes them to violence and aggression over the life course.
Jacobs and her associates (1965) in Scotland posit that violent
criminal conduct is caused by a chromosome abnormality (the XYY
pattern). The male with XYY chromosome pattern is more introverted, and
exhibits anti social behaviour. He tends to behave aggressively and
homosexually than the rest of the population. The assertion has been
refuted by fox who reviewed various studies which support the thesis
that XYY patterns leads to aggressive, anti-social behaviour.
Adoption studies use adopted children, and study their behaviour to see
if any hereditary influence exist that would cause delinquent
behaviour. Siegel (1992: 160) asserts that:
The logic behind this
line of inquiry is that if children’s behaviour is more similar to that
of their biological parents than to that of their adoptive parents, then
the idea of a genetic basis for criminality would be supported. If on
the other hand, adoptees are more similar to their adoptive parent than
their biological parents, an environmental basis for delinquency would
seem more valid.