-
Stealing Among Students: Causes And Remedies
-
-
-
Although stealing among adolescents appears to be fairly common, an assessment of adolescent stealing and its relationship to other behaviors and health problems is incompletely understood. A large sample of high school students (n = 3,999) was examined by self-report survey with 153 questions concerning demographic characteristics, stealing behaviors, other health behaviors including substance use, and functioning variables, such as grades and violent behavior. The overall prevalence of stealing was 15.2 percent (95% confidence interval (CI), 14.8–17.0). Twenty-nine (0.72%) students endorsed symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of DSM-IV-TR kleptomania. Poor grades, alcohol and drug use, regular smoking, sadness and hopelessness, and other antisocial behaviors were all significantly (p < .05) associated with any stealing behavior. Stealing appears to be fairly common among high school students and is associated with a range of potentially addictive and antisocial behaviors. Significant distress and loss of control over this behavior suggest that stealing often has significant associated morbidity.
The lifetime prevalence of stealing appears fairly high. A recent, large epidemiological study of adults found that 11.3 percent of the general population admitted to having shoplifted in their lifetimes.1 This finding is consistent with estimates by the National Association of Shoplifting Prevention that 1 (9.1%) in 11 people has shoplifted during his lifetime.2 Stealing in adults has been associated with other antisocial behaviors, psychiatric comorbidity (e.g., substance use disorders, pathological gambling, and bipolar disorder), and impaired psychosocial functioning.1 Stealing appears to start generally in childhood or adolescence, with approximately 66 percent of individuals reporting lifetime stealing beginning before they were 15 years of age.1
-
-
-
CHAPTER ONE - [ Total Page(s): 3 ]In addition, targeted contacts were made to schools that
were in geographically underrepresented areas, to ensure that the sample
was representative of the state. The final survey therefore contains
schools from each geographical region of the state of Connecticut, and
it contains schools from each of the three tiers of the state’s district
reference groups (DRGs; i.e., groupings of schools based on the
socioeconomic status of the families in the school district). Sampling
f ... Continue reading---
-
CHAPTER ONE - [ Total Page(s): 3 ]In addition, targeted contacts were made to schools that
were in geographically underrepresented areas, to ensure that the sample
was representative of the state. The final survey therefore contains
schools from each geographical region of the state of Connecticut, and
it contains schools from each of the three tiers of the state’s district
reference groups (DRGs; i.e., groupings of schools based on the
socioeconomic status of the families in the school district). Sampling
f ... Continue reading---
ABSRACT -- [Total Page(s) 1]
Page 1 of 1
ABSRACT -- [Total Page(s) 1]
Page 1 of 1