• Evaluation Of Human Capital Development As A Strategy For Increasing Productivity In Public Organizations In Nigeria

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 3]

    Page 2 of 3

    Previous   1 2 3    Next
    • 1.4      STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
      For the purpose of this study, the following hypothesis are formulated:
      Ho:   Human Capital development does not have significant effect on employees’ productivity.
      H1:   Human Capital development have significant effect on employees productivity.
      1.5      SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
      The importance of this project cannot be over emphasized because the prison as stated under the statement of the general problem is an institution for reformation of the character of in-mates. It was also observed that the number of these in-mates is growing by day. Going by these therefore, there is
      1.   The need for human capital development in the service to be able to face the emerging challenges.
      2.   The findings of this research will highlight the strengths and weakness in the area of human capital development that will be very useful in making recommendations that will enhance improved performance of the staff.
      3.   The findings of this research will give rise to a reference material for students and other researchers with interest in human capital development or the prison service in Nigeria.
      1.6       SCOPE OF THE STUDY
      In this research, the researcher will focus on evaluation of Human capital development as a means of increasing productivity in public organizations for national development using Nigeria Prisons Service as a case study. It may not be possible to cover the entire organization; but basically, it is normal to state the nature of the project work and to guide anybody who might  wish to use the work to study an organization for future use. For that purpose, we are to look at human capital development as a means of increasing productivity in public organizations.
      1.7      LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
      The limitations of this research can be viewed from the fact that the it became difficult to granted interviews to the researcher by  members of staff of the Nigeria Prisons Service, Kaduna Command. They were so busy that appointments were booked, changed and new booking obtained before the conduct of the interviews.
      Also some considered the information required to be official and as such wanted to obtain permission from their superior before participation.
      However, efforts were made to reduce the limitations to the lowest minimum by proper education of the interviews that the research is an academic exercise from which findings could help in improving prison service.
      1.8      HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF COMMAND PRISON KADUNA
      Kaduna prison camp was established in 1962 when the prison was established. No missionary ever worked there. It was sullied for by the priest working in Narayi.  It started as a chapel where the in-mates worshiped but later parishioners around the vicinity came to attend mass there, thus arose the need for a bigger church. It is the first and only open prison in Nigeria. Imprisonment is not new as there have always been a means of isolating the deviants so as to prevent them from causing further trouble in the society. For example, the Ogboni House was used as prison by the Yorubas and the existence of prison among the fulanis who used their buildings to isolate offender as a form of punishment were recorded. The first prison in Nigeria was established in 1872 located on Broad street Lagos prison began all over the  world not as ultimate institutions for punishment and correction but initially means for the custody of persons caught up in the criminal justice systems. Awaiting trails or the execution of their punishment such as whipping, banishment and death (Rolhman cited in Alemika, 1987). However, in the mid-nineteenth century, the function of the prison as short term custodia facility changed in Europe and North America to institution for ensuring punishment, penitence and correction of the offender.
      Nigeria had a dual prison system for more than half century until the consolidation of the federal and local prison in 1965. This consolidation followed findings from Mr. Garrat’s report in 1960 of the situation in the prisons which were crowded dirty and under staffed. The take over of the prisons by the federal government was the greatest land mark in the history of prison administration in Nigeria. This led to improved condition of service and recruitment of more educated prison staff. The Nigeria Prison Service, a department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs was headquartered in Lagos and headed by a director responsible for administering nearly 400 facilities including regular prisons special penal institutions, and lock up.

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 3]

    Page 2 of 3

    Previous   1 2 3    Next