• History Of Military Intervention And Administration In Nigeria

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 4]

    Page 2 of 4

    Previous   1 2 3 4    Next
    • STATEMENT OF THE GENERAL PROBLEM
      The research problem, emanates from the statement and view of the previous Nigerian President that the days of “Military coup d’etat’ were gone forever in Nigeria, that democracy has come to stay…it is now clear to all Nigerians that there is no substitute for democracy” said Obasanjo (2007). The nine years of democratic practice in Nigeria has been faced with considerable problems, reminiscences of militarism. We had witnessed incidences such as the order by President ‘Yar Adua’ to close Channels Television for allegedly informing the public that he was likely to resign on account of poor health, forceful closure of the previous Vice President (‘Atiku Abubakar’s)’ office by former President ‘Obasanjo’ and the Gestapo removal of the Mr. ‘Audu Ogbe’ as the Chairman of the ruling party all within a democratic setting. It is very instructive to state, that good governance is the only panacea against military intervention at the level of supplantment (complete substitution of civil authority by military rule and law) while bad governance is an invitation to it. The fact remains that militarized psyche is a problem to democracy, more disturbing is the fact that other African countries such as Ghana had their share of militarism yet has become the democratic college for West Africans. This would guide the discourse herein. Social environment has been known to condition the behavioral dispositions of the individuals. The social environment, which has had considerable impact on the psyche of Nigerians, has seen the long years of military rule, herein referred to as militarism. The militarized social culture being displayed in the democratic dispensation is not unconnected with this. The political behaviors currently displayed in the democratic space, is the dialectical phase of militarism. The analysis, which follows, evaluates this assertion.
      AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
      The major aim of the study is to examine the history of military intervention and administration in Nigeria. Other specific objectives of the study are;
      To examine the negative implications of military interventions in Nigeria.
      To assess the progress made by the military during military interventions.
      To determine the factors that has necessitated the intervention of the military in Nigerian administration.

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 4]

    Page 2 of 4

    Previous   1 2 3 4    Next