• A Comparison Of Performance Of Radiography Students On Computer Based (electronic Examination) And Written Examinations
    [A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI]

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 2]

    Page 1 of 2

    1 2    Next
    • CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
      1.0    BACKGROUND OF STUDY
      Examination is an assessment indeed to measure a test-takers knowledge, skills, attitude, fitness or classification in many other topics as defined by wikipedia (Rehmani, 2003). Examination can be either paper-pen or electronic examination (e-exam).
      Paper-pen examination may be defined as printed set of questions used to test somebody’s knowledge in an exam (Encarta, 2010). Ayo et al. (2007) defines e- examination as a system that “involves the conduct of examinations through the web or the intranet”. Various examination methods are used in universities and other higher education institutions to assess academic progress for example, paper-pencil-based examinations, assignments, presentations etc. Sim, Holifield, and Brown (2004) identified more than 50 varied techniques used within higher education for assessment purposes; the most commonly used are examinations. Both computer based and written exams have their advantages and disadvantages, the conventional examination is plagued with several pitfalls such as examination leakages, Impersonations, inadequate supervisors, demand for gratification by markers, and the most devastating is the delay and non- release of examination results especially where there are large classes or public examinations.
      However, some of the disadvantages associated with computer based assessment, including that Computer crashes are more difficult to resolve than broken pencils. There is the potential that an entire testing session, along with all students’ responses could be lost. Back-up procedures are essential, both in terms of storing student responses and having alternative means to administer the test (Bridgeman, 2009), However computer is also made unsafe for storing official and classified documents in university system and government agencies by computer hackers. A case of hacking in 2015 election was recorded where someone hacked into the INEC website to report results.
      The university examinations as a higher education institution make use of both written and electronic forms of exams. The written exams (paper and pen testing or paper based exams) are more subjective when it comes to marking in the lecturers’ perspective while the computer based exam (e-exams or web based assessment) are more objective but ones a correct answer is type set as a wrong answer, it can’t be corrected ones exam starts and at the end of the assessment what you see is what you actually get.
      The deployment of e-exams began shortly after the university senate approved the commencement of e-examination as from 2009/2010 academic session for departments that are willing and some departments took their examinations electronically during that session. The Radiography department attempted the use of e-test in 2011 and in 2014/2015 academic session 90% of the courses were more of e-exams and the department adopted it as a tool for assessing students.
      Moreover, negative comments from students arouse as a result of dissatisfaction with the type of MCQ’s they answer and the slow nature of the system to proceed to next question which is independent of the timer count down of the exam starting and finishing time which does not allow students to answer all within the time limit.
      The researcher observed that student’s poor academic achievement has been recorded where in RAD 201 many students failed after being thought by the same course lecturer, same handouts, same course outline and the same learning environment. The researcher compared the results of RAD 201 in 2013/2014 academic session which was paper and pen examination and found that in a class of 98 students the result distribution was 2A, 9B+, 17B, 21C+, 8C, 14D, 11E, 16F with failure rate 16.3% While the results of the same course RAD 201 in 2014/2015 academic session which was e-exams found that in a class of 116 students the result distribution was 3A, 1B+, 7B, 5C+, 8C, 16D, 34E, 42F with failure rate 36.1% .
      In percentage, the written examinations has the following: A(2.0%), B+(9.2%), B(17.3%), C+(21.4%), C(8.2%), D(14.3%), E(11.2%), F(16.3%) While the e-
      exams has the following: A (2.58%), B+(0.86%), B(6.02%), C+(4.30%), C(6.88), D(13.76%), E(29.24%), F(36.12%). The aim of the study is to assess the performance difference and perception among radiography students on computer-Based and paper-pen examination.
      1.1    STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
      It has been observed by the researcher that huge number of students have complained about the e-examination application as an assessment tool following a decline in their academic performances since its inception in 2009/2010 in UNIMAID.
      1.2    OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
      1.    To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201, Rad 331, Rad 431, Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions.
      2.    To determine the students attitude towards e-examination.
      1.3    Hypothesis:
      Null hypothesis: states that there is no difference between two population means therefore H0: x1 = x2. Alternate hypothesis: states that there is difference between two means and therefore H1: X1 ≠ X2

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 2]

    Page 1 of 2

    1 2    Next
    • ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]ABSTRACTTITLE: A comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based (electronic examination) and written examinations: a case study of university of Maiduguri.OBJECTIVES: To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201,Rad 331,Rad 431,Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions and to determine the students attitude towards e-examination.MATERIAL AND METHOD: The research design adopte ... Continue reading---

         

      APPENDIX A - [ Total Page(s): 1 ] ... Continue reading---

         

      QUESTIONNAIRE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]QUESTIONNAIRESECTION A: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILEPlease tick [√] in the spaces provided for appropriate responses.1) Age: 18-23 [    ] 24-29 [    ] 30-35 [ ]36-41 [ ] 42-47 [  ]2) Gender: male [ ] female [ ]3) Level: 200:[ ] 300L: [ ] 400:[ ] 500L: [ ]SECTION B: COMPUTER BASED EXAMINATION (CBE)Please tick [√] as appropriate in one box provided against each questions.4)    Do you Use computer in school(a) Strongly agree [ ] (b) agree [ ] (c) Neither Agree or Disagree[ ] (d) disagree ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF TABLES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF TABLESTable 4.1: Demography: Distribution of age of the participants    Table 4.2: Distribution of participants’ gender    Table 4.3: Distribution of participants’ educational level    Table 4.4: showing comparism between paper and pen exams (PPE) and electronic exams (e-exam) in Rad 201 resultsTable 4.5: showing comparism between paper and pen exams (PPE) and electronic exams (e-exam) in Rad 331 resultsTable 4.6: showing comparism between paper and pen exams (PPE) ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF FIGURES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF FIGURESFIG 4.1 showing the age distribution of the respondents    FIG 4.2 showing the gender distribution of the respondents    ... Continue reading---

         

      TABLE OF CONTENTS - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]TABLE OF CONTENTSCover page Title page    Approval page    Certification pageExaminers page   Declaration page Dedication page  Acknowledgement page Table of content   Abstract    CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION1.1    background of the study    1.2    Statement of research problem   1.3    Objectives of the study 1.3    Hypothesis    1.4    Significance of the study    1.5    Scope of the study    1.6    Limitation of the study    1.7    Definitio ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER TWO - [ Total Page(s): 6 ]Karadeniz (2009) studied the impact of paper based, web based and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement. A group of 38 students were experimented for 3 weeks. Significant differences were found between the scores achieved by the students in second week but not in first week. The paper revealed that students had positive attitude towards web based and mobile based assessment due to ease of use, comprehensive and instant feedback. Moreover, most favoured tests were web based and ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER THREE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3.0    STUDY DESIGNThe research design adopted for this study is a descriptive survey method.The descriptive survey seems to ascertain students’ responses on a comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based and written examinations.3.1    SOURCE OF DATAPrimary source of data was used to collect the data.Secondary source of data was also gotten from result records data base of the department for comparison. Hence it was a mixed ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FOUR - [ Total Page(s): 12 ]The table below shows the results obtained from paper-pen exam in 2013/2014 academic session and electronic exam in 2014/2015 academic session. Comparing the two results it is evident that failure rate is higher in electronic exam (13.0%) with average of 53.09 and lower in paper-pen exam (1.9%) with an average of 55.02.The table above shows the results obtained from paper-pen exam in 2013/2014 academic session and electronic exam in 2014/2015 academic session. Comparing the two results it is evi ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FIVE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]CHAPTER FIVE5.0    DISCUSSIONThe result from this study shows that out of the total 171 respondents 63(36.8%) agreed that they prefer PPE to CBE while only 15(8.8%) disagreed and also 75(43.9%) agreed that CBE can not replace the PPE while only 11(6.4%) disagreed. This result is at variance with the findings of Karadeniz (2009) who studied the impact of paper based, web based and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement. A group of 38 students were experimented for 3 weeks. Sig ... Continue reading---

         

      REFRENCES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]REFERENCESAdegbija, M.V., Fakomogbon, M.A. & Daramola, F.O. (2012), the NewTechnologies and the Conduct of E-Examinations: A Case Study of National Open University of Nigeria. British Journals ISSN 2047-3745, Vol.3 (1), pp.60-61Adomi, E.E. and Kpangban, E. (2010), Application of ICTs in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Retrieved May 18, 2013 from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/adomi-kpangban.htmAduwa-Ogiegbaen, S. E., and Iyamu, E. O. S. (2005), Using Information and Communication Technology ... Continue reading---