• A Comparison Of Performance Of Radiography Students On Computer Based (electronic Examination) And Written Examinations
    [A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI]

  • REFRENCES -- [Total Page(s) 1]

    Page 1 of 1

    • REFERENCES
      Adegbija, M.V., Fakomogbon, M.A. & Daramola, F.O. (2012), the NewTechnologies and the Conduct of E-Examinations: A Case Study of National Open University of Nigeria. British Journals ISSN 2047-3745, Vol.3 (1), pp.60-61
      Adomi, E.E. and Kpangban, E. (2010), Application of ICTs in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Retrieved May 18, 2013 from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/adomi-kpangban.htm
      Aduwa-Ogiegbaen, S. E., and Iyamu, E. O. S. (2005), Using Information and Communication Technology in Secondary Schools in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects. Educational Technology & Society, vol 8 (1), pp.104-112
      Alabi, A. T., Isaa, A. O., and Oyekunle R. A. (2012), “The Use of Computer Based Testing Method for the Conduct of Examinations at the University of Ilorin”, International Journal of Learning & Development, ISSN 2164-4063 2012, Vol. 2, No. 3.
      Ayo C. K., Akinyemi, I. O, Adebiyi, A. A., & Ekong, U. O. (2007).The prospects of e-examination implementation in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, vol 8(4), pp.125 –134.
      Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., &Kulik, c.-l.c. (1985).Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,vol 12(2), pp.59-68.
      Bebetos, C, & Antonio, S. (2008). Why use information and communication Technology in schools? Some theoretical and practical issues. Journal of Information Technology for teacher education, vol 10(1and2), pp7-10.
      Bodmann, S. M. and Robinson, D. H. (2004). Speed and Performance Differences among Computer-Based and Paper-Pencil Tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol.31 (1), pp.51 – 60.
      Brakel, P.A., and Chisenga, J. (2003), Impact of ICT based distance learning: The African story. The Electronic Library vol 21 (5), pp. 476-486.
      Bugbee, A. C. (1996), The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer- based testing. Journal of Research in Computer Education,
      Vol 28(3), pp. 282–299.
      Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol 33(5), pp. 593-602.
      Davey, T. (2011).Practical considerations in computer-based testing.Educational Testing Service. Retrieved on October 2nd 2013 from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/CBT-2011.pdf.
      Dermo, J., & Eyre, S. (2008). Secure, reliable and effective institution-wide e- assessment: Paving the ways for new technologies. In F. Khandia (Ed.), Proceedings of 12th International CAA Conference (pp. 95 – 106).Loughborough: University of Loughborough.
      Sadiq F.I. and Onianwa C.U (2011), Towards a Scalable Web Assessment System for Post University Matriculation Examination in Nigeria. African Journal of Computer & ICTs Vol. 4, No. 2. pp 25-30. Retrieved on October 4th 2013 from http://www.ajocict.net.
      Farrel, G. & Isaacs, S. (2007). Survey of ICT and education in Africa. A summary report based on 53 country surveys. Washington, D.C.: infodev/world bank. Retrieved on November 25 2011, from: http://www.infodev.org/en/publication.353.html.
      Friedrich, S. (2008). Quality features of TC Exam: An open source computer- based assessment software. Towards a research agenda on computer-based assessment. Retrieved on November 25 2011, from: http://www.nremt.org/about/CBT.home.asp.
      George, Y. (2011). Students’ perception of computer-based assessment in the University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria. Research paper Retrieved from www.scribd.com/doc/71979150 on March 1, 2014.
      Jekayinfa, A. A. (2008) “History and Development of Public Examination Bodies for Tertiary Institutions”. In Perspectives on the History of Education in Nigeria.    Retrieved    on    March    20    2012    from: www.unilorin.edu.ng/publications/.../JAMBANDNABTEB.doc.
      Jimoh, R. G., Shittu, A. K., &Kawu, Y. K. (2012). Perception of computer based test (CBT) for examining undergraduate chemistry courses. Journal of emerging trends in computing and information sciences, vol 3(2), pp 125‐134.
      Karadeniz, S. (2009). The impacts of paper, web and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement and perceptions. Scientific Research and Essay, vol 4(10), pp 984–991. Retrieved February 15, 2014 from http://www.academicjournals.org/sre.
      Kumar, R (2008). Convergence of ICT and Education. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,(40). Retrieved February 24th, 2013 at http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v40/v40‐95.pdf.
      Lim, E., CH., Ong, B., KC., Wilder-Smith, E., P. V., & Seet, R.. C. S. (2006).
      Computer-based versus pen-and-paper testing: Students’ perception. Ann Acad Med Singapore, vol 35(9), pp 599-603.
      Mubashrah, J., Tariq, R.H. &Shami, P.A. (2012). Computer-based vs paper- based examinations: perceptions of university teachers. The Turkish online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), vol 11(4), pp 371-381.
      Ndume, V., Tilya, F. N. &Twaakyondo, H. (2008). Challenges of adaptive elearning at higher learning institutions: a case study in Tanzania. International journal of computing and ICT research, vol 2(1),pp 47‐59.
      Olawale and Shafi'i M.A. (2010), E- Exams System for Nigerian Universities with Emphasis on Security and Result Integrity, The Seventh International Conference on e-learning for knowledge- Based Society, Thailand.
      Tella, A. & Bashorun, M. T. (2012). Attitude of undergraduate students towards computer‐based test (CBT): a case study of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. International journal of information and communication technology education, vol 8(2), Pp33‐45.
  • REFRENCES -- [Total Page(s) 1]

    Page 1 of 1

    • ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]ABSTRACTTITLE: A comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based (electronic examination) and written examinations: a case study of university of Maiduguri.OBJECTIVES: To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201,Rad 331,Rad 431,Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions and to determine the students attitude towards e-examination.MATERIAL AND METHOD: The research design adopte ... Continue reading---

         

      APPENDIX A - [ Total Page(s): 1 ] ... Continue reading---

         

      QUESTIONNAIRE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]QUESTIONNAIRESECTION A: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILEPlease tick [√] in the spaces provided for appropriate responses.1) Age: 18-23 [    ] 24-29 [    ] 30-35 [ ]36-41 [ ] 42-47 [  ]2) Gender: male [ ] female [ ]3) Level: 200:[ ] 300L: [ ] 400:[ ] 500L: [ ]SECTION B: COMPUTER BASED EXAMINATION (CBE)Please tick [√] as appropriate in one box provided against each questions.4)    Do you Use computer in school(a) Strongly agree [ ] (b) agree [ ] (c) Neither Agree or Disagree[ ] (d) disagree ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF TABLES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF TABLESTable 4.1: Demography: Distribution of age of the participants    Table 4.2: Distribution of participants’ gender    Table 4.3: Distribution of participants’ educational level    Table 4.4: showing comparism between paper and pen exams (PPE) and electronic exams (e-exam) in Rad 201 resultsTable 4.5: showing comparism between paper and pen exams (PPE) and electronic exams (e-exam) in Rad 331 resultsTable 4.6: showing comparism between paper and pen exams (PPE) ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF FIGURES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]LIST OF FIGURESFIG 4.1 showing the age distribution of the respondents    FIG 4.2 showing the gender distribution of the respondents    ... Continue reading---

         

      TABLE OF CONTENTS - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]TABLE OF CONTENTSCover page Title page    Approval page    Certification pageExaminers page   Declaration page Dedication page  Acknowledgement page Table of content   Abstract    CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION1.1    background of the study    1.2    Statement of research problem   1.3    Objectives of the study 1.3    Hypothesis    1.4    Significance of the study    1.5    Scope of the study    1.6    Limitation of the study    1.7    Definitio ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER ONE - [ Total Page(s): 2 ]CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION1.0    BACKGROUND OF STUDYExamination is an assessment indeed to measure a test-takers knowledge, skills, attitude, fitness or classification in many other topics as defined by wikipedia (Rehmani, 2003). Examination can be either paper-pen or electronic examination (e-exam).Paper-pen examination may be defined as printed set of questions used to test somebody’s knowledge in an exam (Encarta, 2010). Ayo et al. (2007) defines e- examination as a system that †... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER TWO - [ Total Page(s): 6 ]Karadeniz (2009) studied the impact of paper based, web based and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement. A group of 38 students were experimented for 3 weeks. Significant differences were found between the scores achieved by the students in second week but not in first week. The paper revealed that students had positive attitude towards web based and mobile based assessment due to ease of use, comprehensive and instant feedback. Moreover, most favoured tests were web based and ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER THREE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3.0    STUDY DESIGNThe research design adopted for this study is a descriptive survey method.The descriptive survey seems to ascertain students’ responses on a comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based and written examinations.3.1    SOURCE OF DATAPrimary source of data was used to collect the data.Secondary source of data was also gotten from result records data base of the department for comparison. Hence it was a mixed ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FOUR - [ Total Page(s): 12 ]The table below shows the results obtained from paper-pen exam in 2013/2014 academic session and electronic exam in 2014/2015 academic session. Comparing the two results it is evident that failure rate is higher in electronic exam (13.0%) with average of 53.09 and lower in paper-pen exam (1.9%) with an average of 55.02.The table above shows the results obtained from paper-pen exam in 2013/2014 academic session and electronic exam in 2014/2015 academic session. Comparing the two results it is evi ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER FIVE - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]CHAPTER FIVE5.0    DISCUSSIONThe result from this study shows that out of the total 171 respondents 63(36.8%) agreed that they prefer PPE to CBE while only 15(8.8%) disagreed and also 75(43.9%) agreed that CBE can not replace the PPE while only 11(6.4%) disagreed. This result is at variance with the findings of Karadeniz (2009) who studied the impact of paper based, web based and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement. A group of 38 students were experimented for 3 weeks. Sig ... Continue reading---