-
A Comparison Of Performance Of Radiography Students On Computer Based (electronic Examination) And Written Examinations
[A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI] -
-
-
REFERENCES
Adegbija, M.V., Fakomogbon, M.A. & Daramola, F.O. (2012), the NewTechnologies and the Conduct of E-Examinations: A Case Study of National Open University of Nigeria. British Journals ISSN 2047-3745, Vol.3 (1), pp.60-61
Adomi, E.E. and Kpangban, E. (2010), Application of ICTs in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Retrieved May 18, 2013 from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/adomi-kpangban.htm
Aduwa-Ogiegbaen, S. E., and Iyamu, E. O. S. (2005), Using Information and Communication Technology in Secondary Schools in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects. Educational Technology & Society, vol 8 (1), pp.104-112
Alabi, A. T., Isaa, A. O., and Oyekunle R. A. (2012), “The Use of Computer Based Testing Method for the Conduct of Examinations at the University of Ilorinâ€, International Journal of Learning & Development, ISSN 2164-4063 2012, Vol. 2, No. 3.
Ayo C. K., Akinyemi, I. O, Adebiyi, A. A., & Ekong, U. O. (2007).The prospects of e-examination implementation in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, vol 8(4), pp.125 –134.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., &Kulik, c.-l.c. (1985).Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,vol 12(2), pp.59-68.
Bebetos, C, & Antonio, S. (2008). Why use information and communication Technology in schools? Some theoretical and practical issues. Journal of Information Technology for teacher education, vol 10(1and2), pp7-10.
Bodmann, S. M. and Robinson, D. H. (2004). Speed and Performance Differences among Computer-Based and Paper-Pencil Tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol.31 (1), pp.51 – 60.
Brakel, P.A., and Chisenga, J. (2003), Impact of ICT based distance learning: The African story. The Electronic Library vol 21 (5), pp. 476-486.
Bugbee, A. C. (1996), The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer- based testing. Journal of Research in Computer Education,
Vol 28(3), pp. 282–299.
Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol 33(5), pp. 593-602.
Davey, T. (2011).Practical considerations in computer-based testing.Educational Testing Service. Retrieved on October 2nd 2013 from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/CBT-2011.pdf.
Dermo, J., & Eyre, S. (2008). Secure, reliable and effective institution-wide e- assessment: Paving the ways for new technologies. In F. Khandia (Ed.), Proceedings of 12th International CAA Conference (pp. 95 – 106).Loughborough: University of Loughborough.
Sadiq F.I. and Onianwa C.U (2011), Towards a Scalable Web Assessment System for Post University Matriculation Examination in Nigeria. African Journal of Computer & ICTs Vol. 4, No. 2. pp 25-30. Retrieved on October 4th 2013 from http://www.ajocict.net.
Farrel, G. & Isaacs, S. (2007). Survey of ICT and education in Africa. A summary report based on 53 country surveys. Washington, D.C.: infodev/world bank. Retrieved on November 25 2011, from: http://www.infodev.org/en/publication.353.html.
Friedrich, S. (2008). Quality features of TC Exam: An open source computer- based assessment software. Towards a research agenda on computer-based assessment. Retrieved on November 25 2011, from: http://www.nremt.org/about/CBT.home.asp.
George, Y. (2011). Students’ perception of computer-based assessment in the University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria. Research paper Retrieved from www.scribd.com/doc/71979150 on March 1, 2014.
Jekayinfa, A. A. (2008) “History and Development of Public Examination Bodies for Tertiary Institutionsâ€. In Perspectives on the History of Education in Nigeria. Retrieved on March 20 2012 from: www.unilorin.edu.ng/publications/.../JAMBANDNABTEB.doc.
Jimoh, R. G., Shittu, A. K., &Kawu, Y. K. (2012). Perception of computer based test (CBT) for examining undergraduate chemistry courses. Journal of emerging trends in computing and information sciences, vol 3(2), pp 125â€134.
Karadeniz, S. (2009). The impacts of paper, web and mobile based assessment on students’ achievement and perceptions. Scientific Research and Essay, vol 4(10), pp 984–991. Retrieved February 15, 2014 from http://www.academicjournals.org/sre.
Kumar, R (2008). Convergence of ICT and Education. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,(40). Retrieved February 24th, 2013 at http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v40/v40â€95.pdf.
Lim, E., CH., Ong, B., KC., Wilder-Smith, E., P. V., & Seet, R.. C. S. (2006).
Computer-based versus pen-and-paper testing: Students’ perception. Ann Acad Med Singapore, vol 35(9), pp 599-603.
Mubashrah, J., Tariq, R.H. &Shami, P.A. (2012). Computer-based vs paper- based examinations: perceptions of university teachers. The Turkish online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), vol 11(4), pp 371-381.
Ndume, V., Tilya, F. N. &Twaakyondo, H. (2008). Challenges of adaptive elearning at higher learning institutions: a case study in Tanzania. International journal of computing and ICT research, vol 2(1),pp 47â€59.
Olawale and Shafi'i M.A. (2010), E- Exams System for Nigerian Universities with Emphasis on Security and Result Integrity, The Seventh International Conference on e-learning for knowledge- Based Society, Thailand.
Tella, A. & Bashorun, M. T. (2012). Attitude of undergraduate students towards computerâ€based test (CBT): a case study of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. International journal of information and communication technology education, vol 8(2), Pp33â€45.
-
-
-
ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]ABSTRACTTITLE: A comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based (electronic examination) and written examinations: a case study of university of Maiduguri.OBJECTIVES: To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201,Rad 331,Rad 431,Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions and to determine the students attitude towards e-examination.MATERIAL AND METHOD: The research design adopte ... Continue reading---
-
ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]ABSTRACTTITLE: A comparison of performance of radiography students on computer based (electronic examination) and written examinations: a case study of university of Maiduguri.OBJECTIVES: To compare academic performance differences among computer based (e-exams) and paper-pen examination in some selected courses; Rad 201,Rad 331,Rad 431,Rad 531 in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 academic sessions and to determine the students attitude towards e-examination.MATERIAL AND METHOD: The research design adopte ... Continue reading---
REFRENCES -- [Total Page(s) 1]
Page 1 of 1
REFRENCES -- [Total Page(s) 1]
Page 1 of 1