• The State As A Community Of Persons In Hegel; A Critique

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 4]

    Page 4 of 4

    Previous   1 2 3 4
    • The summary of his political purpose could rightly be regarded as an effort to reconcile freedom and authority which is accomplished when the state emerges and imposes its laws (in the form of the constitution) upon the lesser associations in which the individuals are involved. Sequel to this he upholds a standardized organic system which is directly contrapuntal to Rousseau’s absolute democracy.
      More over, his desire includes portraying the state as an unrivalled and magnificent institution that invests its government with standards of absolute reason and laws that are universally valid. To this end he sets out to reconstruct political philosophy in general. Little wonder then, the outcome of such an ambitious venture was his elegant work “The Philosophy of Right”- a work that is difficult to comprehend. It was as a result of this incomprehensibility of this material that many people described him as a fellow that embraced an abstract philosophy.
      Hegel’s aim was to set forth a philosophical system so comprehensive that it would encompass the ideas of his predecessors and create a conceptual framework in terms of which both the past and future could be understood philosophically. Such an aim would require nothing short of a full account of reality itself. Thus, Hegel conceived the subject matter of philosophy to be reality as a whole. This reality, or the total developmental process of everything that is, he referred to as the Absolute.
      According to Hegel, the task of philosophy is to chart the development of the Absolute. This involves first, making clear the internal rational structure of the Absolute; second, demonstrating the manner in which the Absolute manifests itself in nature and human history; and, third, explicating the teleological nature of the Absolute, that is, showing the end or purpose towards which the Absolute is directed.
      [1]G.W.F.Hegel,Philosophy of Right, trans.by T.M. Knox,(London: Clarendon Press),1967,p.183
      [2] Reich is a noun meaning; German state or empire(esp. formally):example: the third Reich (i.e. Germany under   
        Hitler’s rule (1933-1945)
      [3] H.Marcus, Reason and Revolution, Great Britain Brothers Limited.1969). p.13
      [4]Loc. Cit
      [5] G.H.Sabine,A History of Political Theories,4th ed. London: Oxford and IBN,1973.p.576
      [6] Loc.Cit.
      [7] M.I. Nwoko, Basic World Political Theories, Nigeria: Claverianum press, 1988. p.154
      [8] G.W.F Hegel, The Philosophy of Right, p.10
      [9] Entelechy is that that has potentials; especially future prospect. The Aristotelian “entelechy” was a form of vital force that converted all possibilities (teleological propensities) into actualities. It was the guiding spirit that accounted not only for the maintenance of life, but for its development, as in progression from egg to adult organism.
      Microsoft ® Encarta ® Encyclopedia 2005 © 1993-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
      [10] G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right. p.260
  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 4]

    Page 4 of 4

    Previous   1 2 3 4