• A Critique Of Wiredu’s Concept Of Truth

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 7]

    Page 6 of 7

    Previous   2 3 4 5 6 7    Next
    • 1.5.THE PRAGMATICS THEORY OF TRUTH
                In pragmatic epistemology, truth is regarded not as absolute but relative. It is never in a perfect state. Immutable or eternal. Rather, it can change from one generation to another. According to Wiredu…” Truth there is  necessarily bind to point of view, on better truth is view from some point and there are as many truth as there are points of view”.28
                According to pragmatists, prominent among whom are scanders pierce, Williams James and John Dewey, man should concern himself with the things or events that can be perceived by the senses and not with the abstract and the speculation.
                Hence the criterion of truth must be traceable to experience. According to Williams James:
      Truth in our idea and beliefs means that ideas (which themselves are but party of our experience) become true is so far as they helped us to get into satisfactorily relation with other parts of our experience…Any idea that will carry us prosperously from one part of our experience linking things satisfactorily, working securely simpling saving labor: true for just so much, true in so far  truth instrumentally.29
      This quota from James Terminate in a term which embodied the instrument essence of pragmatism and which brings some philosophers to assign the designation, instrumentalism to the general pagmatic philosophy. According  to James, the function of thought is not to copy or image reality but to form idea in order to satisfy the individual interest. Thus on   pragmatic principles, if the hypothesis, for instance, of God satisfactorily in the widest sense of the world, it is true. However, it is in dewey  that we should be most interested, for Wiredu feels the strong affinity with his theory of truth.
                For Dewey, ideas become true when their ”draft upon existence’ is honor by the verifying facts they promise. The notion that truth some how exists antecedent to and separate from inquiry in meaningless in Dewey’s thought for  him truth is notable. “Truth happens to be an idea” when it becomes verified or a warranted assertion.
                Dewey considers truth from the point of view of verification and places it out the end of all enquiries.  Hence, following Dewey, Wiredu’s  tense formulation of the  Deweyian posistion is that’s truth is warranted assertibility.30
      Precisely this portion emphasizes that truth is what rational inquiry warrants us to assert. Instead of being a prior postulate, truth is here viewed an end product din practice. In “Dewey words”.
               
  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 7]

    Page 6 of 7

    Previous   2 3 4 5 6 7    Next