• Election Malpractice And Democratization In Nigeria’s Fourth Republic

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 3]

    Page 2 of 3

    Previous   1 2 3    Next
    • 1.3     Research Questions
      1.     Did unreliability of security agencies during election contribute to election malpractice during the 2015 general elections in Nigeria?
      2.     Did lack of INEC autonomy contribute to election malpractice during the 2015 general elections in Nigeria?
      3.     Did the culture of electoral impunity contribute to election malpractice during the 2015 general elections in Nigeria?
      4.     How can election malpractice be minimized in future elections in order to stabilize democracy in Nigeria?
      1.4     Objectives of the Study
      1.     To ascertain whether unreliability of security agencies during election contributed to election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Nigeria.
      2.     To examine whether the lack of INEC autonomy contributed to election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Nigeria.
      3.     To determine the extent to which culture of electoral impunity contributed to election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Nigeria.
      4.     To render viable suggestions on how to how to minimize election malpractice in future elections so as to stabilize democracy in Nigeria.
      1.5     Statement of Hypotheses
      H0    Unreliability of security agencies during election did not tend to promote election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Akwa Ibom State.
      H1    Unreliability of security agencies during election tended to promote election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Akwa Ibom State.
      H0    Lack of INEC autonomy did not tend to promote election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Akwa Ibom State.
      H2    Lack of INEC autonomy tended to promote election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Akwa Ibom State.
      H0    The culture of electoral impunity did not tend to promote election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Akwa Ibom State.
      H3    The culture of electoral impunity tended to promote election malpractice in 2015 general elections in Akwa Ibom State.
      1.6     Significance of the Study
      This research is significant in such a way that it examines the phenomenon of election malpractice and how it threatens the efforts at democratization in Nigeria’s fourth republic. It also x-rays the fundamental factors associated with election malpractice ad ultimately recommends ways for obviating them. It will serve as an eye opener to researchers, government officials and general readers who truly intend to understand the impediment to democratic consolidation in Nigeria. Again, it will serve to sensitize the public and create awareness as to the destructive potentials of election malpractice towards the aspiration for democratization in Nigeria.
      1.7      Scope of the Study
      Theoretical scope: The theoretical scope of this research borders around the concept and theory of democracy and the conduct of elections.
      Spatial scope: The spatial scope of this study is the country Nigeria, historically encompassing the political administrative epoch from 1999 up till date - the fourth republic. Accordingly, understudied elections conducted within the period are the 2003, 2007, 2011, and 2015 elections.

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 3]

    Page 2 of 3

    Previous   1 2 3    Next
    • ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]The conduct of free and fair elections has become the yardstick for measuring the strength and credibility of a country’s democracy. The absence of free and fair elections has become an almost insurmountable obstacle to democratization in most African countries, especially in Nigeria. The history of the conduct of elections in the country is predominated with the prevalence of electoral misconducts and malpractices which has weakened the nerves of democratization and the country’s ... Continue reading---