• The Pitfalls Of Poverty Alleviation Programmes In The Curbing The Incidence Of Poverty In Rural Areas

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 3]

    Page 2 of 3

    Previous   1 2 3    Next
    • 1.2 Problem statement
      In Nigeria, we know that all governments follow some form of the poverty reduction strategy. However, the extent to which these programs affected the poor in the target group remained unanswered. Recent studies of poverty and its reduction agencies, as well as programs, show that there is a significant gap between the goal of reducing or eliminating poverty and achieving the goal.
      It seems that the efforts of the various governments are ineffective and that, consequently, little effort has been made to reap the benefits. For anti-poverty agencies, their results do not seem to justify their huge financial allocations. The perception of the poor in terms of formal poverty reduction institutions is largely one of inefficiency and irrelevance in their lives, as state poverty reduction measures do little to their struggle for survival and rarely help them out of poverty.
      1.3 Purpose of the study
      The purpose of this study is to examine the pitfalls of poverty alleviation programmes in the curbing the incidence of poverty in rural areas. Specifically, the objectives are:
      1 To measure the effectiveness of poverty alleviation programmes in the curbing the incidence of poverty in rural areas;
      2. To assess their capability for reducing poverty;
      3 To identify reasons for their failure or success; and
      5. To suggest and recommend appropriate poverty reduction strategies for Nigeria.
      1.4 Significance of the study
      The study should be a concerted effort to identify, articulate and highlight the existence, causes and impact of poverty in Nigeria. It's about streamlining poverty reduction strategies to make them more effective. The study should also benefit a number of groups, including those involved in poverty reduction, such as policy makers, planners, managers, coordinators and observers from poverty and poor agencies, ultimately benefiting from the efforts and even the general public.
      Study hypothesis

  • CHAPTER ONE -- [Total Page(s) 3]

    Page 2 of 3

    Previous   1 2 3    Next