• Investigation Of Effects Of Alum And Potassium Sesquicarbonate On The Fire Characteristics Of Flexible Polyurethane Foam

  • CHAPTER THREE -- [Total Page(s) 7]

    Page 5 of 7

    Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7    Next

    • Effect of Flame Retardants on Degradation Profiles

      Numbers of observations are made in Fig. 12:

      Evidently the temperature beyond which no more degradation takes place is not affected by the presence of FR, or its concentration, i.e., the temperature of catastrophic degradation is constant with/ without FR.

      It can be seen that the temperature is constant both for treated and untreated samples.

      Numbers of observations are made in Fig. 13:

      1. The introduction of FRS dramatically delayed the onset of degradation.

      2. This delay effect is more with potassium sesquicarbonate than potash alum.

      In fact, at higher concentrations, it required more than 12 mins for degradation to commence.

      It can be seen in Fig. 14a that;

      (1) This first stage of degradation at any stage (including the untreated sample) has three sub-temperature steps, viz, the start, the mid and the final temperatures.

      (2) The presence of Alum FR slightly raised the start - temperature viz-a-vis that of the untreated sample. (3) As for the mid and final temperatures, there's hardly any observable differences that is that once degradation has started, these temperatures are not affected by the presence or the concentrations of Alum as FR.

      The observations in Fig. 14b are very similar to those in Fig 14a, i.e., generally the presence of potash as FR only increased the onset temperature of degradation to some degree while the mid and the final temperatures are not affected. Somehow the final temperatures of degradation are increased by the presence of Potash, i.e., FR effects are evidently in Fig. 14b and 15b.

      The observations in Fig. 16 are rather conflicting in that whereas Alum FR increased the duration of thermal degradation for all the concentrations used, the case of potash is not clear - cut. In fact, it is only at 0.1 and 0.3 pph concentrations that the presence of potash enhance the times of thermal degradation. For other concentrations, the effect is minimal, if anything. Thermal degradation of materials requires energy supply for the breakage of bonds. This process known as pyrolysis is facilitated by conditions where energy is readily available. Thus it was expedient to monitor the changes in energy requirement with FR concentrations, Fig. 17a - Fig. 18b, it can be said from the observations in these figures that generally the presence of the FRS Alum and potash necessitated higher energy demands for pyrolysis / degradation to take place.

      The flame retardant treatment of materials to reduce risk and destruction has been practiced for a long time [60 - 64]. Similarly the mechanism of degradation of certain substance such as cellulose [65], and selected polymerics [63], are well documented. The uses of alum as FR for cellulose materials have been extensively investigated by workers in Nigeria [60 - 69]
      In the work reported here where the substrate is treated with either Alum or potash, the retardancy actions observed can be explained as follows: Alum functions as FR in that at the temperature of thermal degradation it decomposes according to the equation:

      K2SO4.Al2(SO4)3.24H2O    K2SO4 + AL2O3 + SO3 + 24H2O

      The products of this decomposition process affect the degree of flammability of the pyrolytic products. For example, both SO3 and H2O reduce the effective concentration of O2 in the system water also has a cooling effect. Al2O3 on the other hand forms an impervious layer on the substrate and, as it were suppresses the egress of flammable pyrolysates. Thus Alum acts as a FR by the solid - and vapour phase mechanisms. Potash or Akanwu or potassium sesquicarbonate, K2CO3.2KHCO3. 3/2 H2O), has not been featured as a FR but a cursory look at the chemistry of its decomposition at high temperature would indicate that it has the potential to act as one especially by the vapour and condensed phase mechanism.

      K2CO3 . 2KHCO3.3/2 H2O  D         2K2O + 3CO2 + 3/2 H2O.

      Thus CO2 and H2O dilute the concentrations of oxygen and flammable pyrolysates while K2O acts in the condensed phase to suppress flame propagation. It must however be stated that the effects of Alum and potash reported here are effective though not overly dramatic either because of the concentrations used or more likely because the substrate itself, polyurethane as a material is inherently flame retardant. Nitrogen - containing compounds such as urea's, amides, guanidine's etc. are used as flame retardant [17], by a mechanism that proceeds via the formation of N - containing acids.


  • CHAPTER THREE -- [Total Page(s) 7]

    Page 5 of 7

    Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7    Next
    • ABSRACT - [ Total Page(s): 1 ] ABSTRACT The effectiveness of alum and potassium sesquicarbonate was studied by incorporating various concentrations of the flame retardants into the polyurethane foam sample. The flammability tests were carried out and the results showed that as the concentration of the flame retardants increased, the flame propagation rate, after glow time, burn length and flame duration decreased for both flame retardants, while ignition time, add-on and char formation increased for both fla ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF TABLES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]  LIST OF TABLES     Table 1.    :       Solubility of the compounds.  Table 2.    :       Foam formulation using Alum as flame retardant.  Table 3.   :       Effect of flame retardants on ignition time.  Table 4.    :       Effects of flame retardants on burn length.  Table 5.    :       Effects of flame retardants on flame propagation Rate.  Table 6.   :       Effects of flame retardants on flame duration.  Table 7.    :     ... Continue reading---

         

      LIST OF FIGURES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ]  LIST OF FIGURES  Fig. 1:       The combustion process. Fig. 2:       Basic unit in a urethane block copolymer.  Fig. 3:       Structure-property relationships in polyurethane.  Fig. 4:       Thermogravimetric analyzer  Fig. 5 :       Effects of flame retardants on Ignition time. Fig. 6 :       Effects of flame retardants on burn length Fig. 7 :       Effects of flame retardants on flame propagation rate  Fig. 8:       Effects of flame ret ... Continue reading---

         

      TABLE OF CONTENTS - [ Total Page(s): 1 ] TABLE OF CONTENTS    Title page Certification                                       Dedication                                          Acknowledgements                            Abstract                                             Table of contents            ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER ONE - [ Total Page(s): 8 ]CHAPTER ONEINTRODUCTION CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION In every day to day activity, foam materials are all around our homes, vehicles, schools and industries. It is the cushioning material of choice in almost all furniture and bedding. It is used as carpet cushions. It is the material used for pillows, roof liners, sound proofing, car and truck seats. Foam has become such a widely used material because it provides a unique combination of form and function [1]. Types of foam such as n ... Continue reading---

         

      CHAPTER TWO - [ Total Page(s): 2 ] Thermogravimetric analysis: This determines changes in weight in relation to change in temperature. It was determined using a thermogravimetric analyzer made by Schimadzu TA – 60ws model. The furnace of the instrument was first opened to stabilize the instrument. The furnace has two pans. The foam samples were weighed and placed in one of the pan and the second pan contained Alumina which serves as the reference point used in balancing the weight of the samples. It was se ... Continue reading---

         

      REFRENCES - [ Total Page(s): 1 ] REFERENCESM.E. Bailey (1971), Polyurethane Study in Chemical Principles, Journal Chemistry Education, pp 48, 809. T.W Solomon Graham (1980), Organic Chemistry 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, pp 334 – 339. C.J. Benning (1969), Plastic Foams, The Physical and Chemistry of Product Performance and Process Technology, Vol. I, Chemistry and Physics of Foams Formation, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 235-247J.H Troitzch (1990), International Plastics Flammability Handboo ... Continue reading---