Egbule (1998) noted that the teaching
and learning activities of vocational agriculture at the secondary
schools are grossly insufficient to elicit the desired level of
initiative and creativity in students. It noted that the recommended
instructional strategies is full of “showingâ€, ‘telling’ and ‘observing’
with a few cases of ‘doing’ and ‘practice’ thus contradicting the
recommended ‘learning by doing’ and ‘guided discovery’ instructional
strategies (National Policy on Education, 2004). Studies have also shown
that graduates of vocational agriculture in senior secondary schools in
Nigeria have often not been able to take up paid jobs at the
completion of their secondary education thus defeating the goal changing
of secondary agricultural science to a vocational subject (Olaitan,
1997; Okorie, 2000; Obi, 2005; and Ikeoji and Agwubike, 2006).
Education, according to the global monitoring report should focus its
attention to the solution of challenges faced by the growing numbers of
unemployed youths and who are also trapped in poverty [UNESCO,] (2005);
UNO, (2005).
Empirical Studies on Attitude of Students Towards Practical Agricultural Science
Students’
attitudes to science and how students’ view the contents of science are
extremely influential for having the potential to significantly affect
their disposition towards attainment and their retention within science
both in and out of school (Bricheno, Johnston & Sears, 2001;
Gardner, 1975; Kind, Jones & Barmby, 2007; Lakshmi, 2004; Osborne,
et al., 2003; The Royal Society, 2008). There has been an ongoing focus
in attempting to understand students’ attitudes to science within
science education research (for example, Barmby, Kind & Jones, 2008;
Schibeci, 1984; The Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome
Trust, 2000), along with the struggle to actually define and
differentiate these attitudes towards science (Zain, Rohandi &
Jusoh, 2010). Such areas have had a greater focus in the social world
more recently with the view regarding a shortage of science graduates
(House of Commons, 2002a) alongside the claims that employers are
feeling graduates have a lack of practical experience and laboratory
skills which is becoming a barrier to recruitment of Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) staff (Confederation of
British Industry, 2011).
These concerns, alongside the fluctuating
number of student post compulsion in science(Taylor, 2009), suggests
that more research is needed to understand students’ attitudes to
practical work, especially when students spend “between one third and a
half of all lesson time†(SCORE, 2008) doing practical work in secondary
school science. Research has suggested the need to understand why
students think the way they do to better understand and hopefully
benefit student uptake as well as enhancing student engagement and
enjoyment in science (Barmby et al., 2008). Also, researchers have often
discussed (Chen & Howard, 2010; Kim & Song, 2009) the potential
links between positive student attitude and its influence on continued
participation and attainment.
It could be understood that positive
attitudes towards science may mean students are more inclined to
participate and/or be more motivated to achieve In order to understand
attitudes to science, it is important to understand what is meant by an
‘attitude’ although it is a concept that is not easily definable. An
attitude according to Ajaja (2008) is a mental or neutral state of
readiness organized through experience, exerting a directive or dynamic
influences upon the individuals response to all objects and situations
with which is related. Anders and Bergs (2005) viewed attitude as a way
of thinking or feeling of a person which makes him or her to behave or
act in a particular way. The attitude of youth towards a subject or
course of study influences the amount of content materials he/she
internalizes and the acquisition of the appropriate skills for the
subject (Anders and Bergs, 2005, Ajaja, 2005 and Dutse et al, 2010).